Important Court Filings
At the United States Supreme Court:
At the Oklahoma Supreme Court:
At the Oklahoma Corporation Commission:
-
The AT&T Bribery Refund Application
September 14, 2015
-
Commissioner Bob Anthony's Affidavit
September 16, 2015
- Affidavits of Expert Witness James Proctor
-
Affidavit 1 – explaining the basis of the refund amount
November 25, 2015
-
Affidavit 2 – explaining why, in addition to the bribery, the
vote allowing Southwestern Bell to keep the excess revenues was also
invalid because it was subject to Bell’s own
stipulation agreement placing
its rates subject to refund
January 22, 2016
-
Affidavit 3 – explaining how the Attorney General’s arguments on
behalf of AT&T contradict those of previous Attorneys General, and
why the commission’s 1997 Remand Order that attempted to close the
PUD 260 case forever was limited and fundamentally flawed
February 23, 2016
-
The
Department of Defense's Motion for Temporary Admission
September 1, 2016
-
Oklahoma Corporation Commission Order No. 655899
September 7, 2016
- Commissioner Bob Anthony's Dissenting Opinions
-
Dissenting Opinion 1 – disagreeing with the majority's finding
that $16 billion in refunds is not in "the public interest" and its
finding that the bribed order was still good legislation despite the
dirty hands that prepared it; decrying the majority's failure to do
its constitutional duty and "correct abuses," its ignoring of
bribery's repugnancy to the constitution, its denial of the
applicants due process rights by refusing to hear the bribery refund
application, and its denial of the Department of Defense's motion
to join the case; explaining the majority's misinterpretation of the
1987 Stipulation Order and the
PUD 662 settlement
September 7, 2016
-
Dissenting Opinion 2 – further explaining the majority's
misinterpretation of the 1987
Stipulation Order and the 1997 Remand Order
September 9, 2016
-
Dissenting Opinion 3 – explaining the majority's
misinterpretaion of the PUD 662 settlement, and how it did NOT also
resolve the issues in PUD 260
September 8, 2016
All Court Filings
At the Oklahoma Corporation Commission:
-
http://imaging.occeweb.com/imaging/OAP.aspx
-
"PUD 344" - the AT&T Bribery Refund Application case
All filings are available on the OCC website via the link above by entering:
-
the case number "201500344" in the first blank
-
and "PUD" in the Case Type blank.
-
"PUD 260" - the original (bribed) Southwestern Bell
rate case
All filings are available on the OCC website via the link above by entering:
-
the case number "860000260" in the first blank
-
and "PUD" in the Case Type blank.
-
"PUD 662" - the companion case to the bribed "PUD 260" case
All filings are available on the OCC website via the link above by entering:
-
the case number "890000662" in the first blank
-
and "PUD" in the Case Type blank.
At the Oklahoma Supreme Court:
At the United States Supreme Court:
(Return to the top.)
